canada goose sale http://www.canadagoosestore.be/ https://www.gasinc.nl/ canada goose outlet canada goose outlet www.kunstquelle.ch www.pompieririvera.ch www.penromand.ch canada goose schweiz www.coralclubin.eu www.motobiketoursnz.ch canada goose outlet www.animaqua.be www.bingbing.fr www.artiphoto.be pipopatat.nl canada goose outlet

EAT overturns decision to dismiss employee for failure to provide evidence of entitlement to work 

28th Jun 2018

judgement

 

In Afzal v East London Pizza Ltd t/a Dominos Pizza, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has overturned an employment tribunal’s decision that the dismissal of an employee for failing to provide evidence of his entitlement to work in the UK was fair.

A, who is from Pakistan, married a European national in 2011 and acquired time-limited leave to work in the UK, which expired on 12 August 2016. After that time, he had a right to apply for a document evidencing his right to permanent residence that would continue his right to work. As long as he applied by 12 August, he was entitled to work while the application was being considered.

In both June and July, ELP Ltd reminded A to provide evidence that he had made an in-time application and to do so before 11 August to avoid last minute problems. On 12 August, A sent his employer an e-mail which he said contained evidence of the application. However, ELP Ltd could not open the attachments. Concerned about exposure to criminal or civil penalties should it continue to employ A, ELP Ltd sent him notice of dismissal with no right of appeal, which he received on 15 August. Following his dismissal, when satisfactory evidence of A’s right to work was presented, ELP Ltd offered to re-engage A but as a new starter. This meant his continuous employment with the company would be broken and he would receive no back pay for the period between dismissal and re-engagement. A then made a claim to an employment tribunal of unfair dismissal.

At the first stage in the Employment Tribunal, the employment judge found that ELP Ltd genuinely believed that A’s employment was prohibited by statute, which amounted to ‘some other substantial reason’ for dismissal. Furthermore, he considered that it was both reasonable for ELP Ltd to hold this belief (given the lack of evidence in this regard) and for it to act decisively on 12 August for fear of exposure to criminal and civil penalties. The case therefore hinged on the question of the right to appeal the dismissal.

The judge’s view at the first stage was that whilst it is generally good practice to include a right of appeal, there was in this case ‘nothing to appeal against’: the test to be applied was whether ELP Ltd had reasonable grounds for believing that A had made a valid application for an extension before his work permit expired. There was no basis for the employer to ‘back-calculate or back-fill’ a belief it did not have on 12 August. In those circumstances, the judge could not conclude that it was unfair to fail to offer a right of appeal in the dismissal letter. He therefore dismissed A’s unfair dismissal claim.

Upon appeal to the EAT, His Honour Judge David Richardson observed that in modern employment practice the provision of an appeal against dismissal is virtually universal and is recommended by the Acas Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. Nevertheless, there will be exceptional circumstances where an employment tribunal can conclude that a dismissal was fair despite the absence of an appeal.

In this instance however, the employment judge was wrong to conclude that there was ‘nothing to appeal against’. ELP Ltd’s genuine belief that A’s employment was illegal justified his urgent dismissal but turned out to be wrong. If an appeal had been offered, there were various ways in which A could have established his right to work – he could have provided documents demonstrating the in-time application, ELP Ltd might have accepted the word of a solicitor, or ELP Ltd might have obtained the relevant number from A and then made its own enquiry of the Employment Checking Service. Had A’s right to work been established, there was no reason why A should not have been reinstated. ELP Ltd would not be committing a criminal offence or incurring liability to a penalty by doing so. HHJ David Richardson therefore allowed A’s appeal remitted the matter to the employment judge.

Employment Law Seminar 6th March 2014 – The two lady speakers were great. It was really helpful having questions from the floor and they both provided really helpful case studies of the recent cases they worked on. Overall to cram all that information in just two hours, it was a good event and would like to attend more!

Chetna Kerai, NatCen Social Research

Thank you for all your great work on the tribunal. I am pleased with the outcome and continue to hold my breath and hope that XXX can move on.

Chief Executive of City Company

The Employment Law Seminar on the 18th June 2014 was professional, informative, practically interactive and enjoyable. Lovely venue – calm & helped the acoustics. Thank you.

Suzanne Prince, HR Consultant, Osram

I have been using Hina’s Penguin Guide and it’s fantastic

Danish Ahmad – (Chamber of Commerce)

10th September 2014 Discrimination From the Inside Out Event – “I’ll take this opportunity to say what a great seminar it was and that the passion and knowledge of professor Livingstone was truly inspiring.”

Florentina Pascaru, HR Coordinator, Central & Cecil

Thank you so much for all your help and advice. It was nice dealing with someone who honestly cared

Kylea Jarrold

“Hina, thank you very much for yesterday’s employment law seminar, it was extremely informative, skilfully presented in a professional and ‘HR friendly’ manner.

 I was particularly impressed by you and your team as all of you communicated your respective knowledgeable and experience in a pragmatic way, which, in my personal experience is not always the case. I have attended other legal firm’s seminars and although the content is usually good it is frequently presented using too much ‘lawyer speak’, often assuming the very worst outcome including extreme escalated litigation, which for the majority of cases is not the most likely outcome. I realise that we as HR practitioners, need to be aware of worst case scenarios but sometimes there is too much emphasis on this. “

Suzanne Prince, HR Contractor

I could not have hoped for better assistance and expertise in resolving the recent issue around my employment than I received from Partners Employment Lawyers.

In a very stressful and unfamiliar situation for me, I was extremely grateful that Partners Employment Lawyers understood my situation quickly and perceptively, and then worked hard to secure for me the outcome that I desired.

The firm displayed a level of professionalism and sensitivity to my personal situation that I appreciated and will not forget.

At all times the lawyers were mindful of the result I desired. As the matter progressed they explained to me clearly and in balanced terms the likelihood of achieving that outcome.

I appreciated Partners Employment Lawyers also giving me thoughtful advice on other, broader points relevant to my future employment, which I now understand it was important to make clear as part of a successful outcome. Without reminding me of these, my longer-term interests, I could easily have thought about only the immediate problem at hand, which I now see would have been ultimately to my detriment.

Partners Employment Lawyers spoke with me from a more holistic perspective on my employment future than I was able to take, which this was an immense benefit to me. Giving me a calm and encompassing perspective at such moments was, itself, an immense relief to me, as was simply having someone on my side.

Individual Client

“I would like to say that Partners were very helpful in sorting out a case in my previous workforce that could have been a potentially awkward situation.

They dealt with the case really well and made me feel calm in a difficult time for me.

They were able to sort out the case quickly and were able to offer me some good advice along the way.”

Individual Client

The Employment Law Seminar on the 18th June 2014 was very informative and relaxing, thank you.

Kerrie Smith, HR & Office Manager, John Brown Media

“I would like to acknowledge and appreciate the role that Partners Employment Lawyers and in particular Remziye Ozcan, played in securing a Settlement Agreement with my former employer.

Remziye was very helpful in clarifying my legal position in the debate with my employer over redeployment vs. retirement vs.  redundancy.  Even though we work on opposite sides of the world and in different time zones, she always responded to my queries, quickly absorbed the volumes of data on company policy and procedures which I sent her and promptly provided me sound practical advice to help achieve my objective.  The whole tone of the conversation changed when my employer recognized that I had engaged professional outside help and there is no doubt in my mind that without the intervention of Partners Employment Lawyers, the debate would have been more protracted and likely more contentious.

Their charges were very reasonable and in any event the cost is more than covered by the outcome. I would have no hesitation in recommending Partners Employment Lawyers to any employee who found him or herself in a similar position.”

Individual Client

Hina and Remziye recently delivered employment law sessions to our London management team which focused on a range of key employment law issues. Feedback was that the sessions were excellent, informative and well presented. They discussed not only actual case law but also advised on company-relevant scenarios, based on their knowledge of our internal policies and procedures.

 

 

 

HR Department, Euromonitor International Ltd.

Great Employment law update – Thank you.

Raffelina Huber, Associate Director, Central Eastern CSU

Employment Law Seminar 18th June 2014 – A very interesting session with good speakers covering a range of topics

Julie Fisher-Jones, Parliamentary & Health Service Ombudsman

“Partners came on site to deliver a session on managing redundancies…their delivery was clear and was easily understood – there was certainly no confusing legal speak or jargon that we had to get our heads around. Partners are highly recommended”

Company Training Client

I have worked with Hina Belitz on numerous complex employment issues within our business. We have an open and consultative relationship which ensures risks are addressed in a consistent manner. This has led to the honesty and openness I rely on to make key strategic decisions for the business.

Di Milliard, Head of Human Resources & Recruitment Business Monitor International

‘A highly talented and resourceful lawyer’

Richard Rodelli, President and CEO, Thermo Electric Inc’

“A well though out and delivered employment law seminar that covered important and critical areas of employment law and issues facing employers”

Fran Ryba, HR Consultant, Fran Ryba Consultancy Ltd

Since Hina’s training day we have reduced absences by 60%

Mark Jackson, Seebord

“I would like to take this opportunity to thank Remziye and Partners Employment Lawyers for the support and professional service. You were extremely knowledgeable and efficient and I would have no hesitation in using the service again.”

Eileen Flatley

“I would like to thank you for the way in which you handled my employment matters.  The whole team at Partners were at all times professional, compassionate and kept me fully informed at every stage in particular Remziye helped me through a situation that I found very difficult and stressful and I cannot thank her enough, I would highly recommend Partners Services.”

Individual Client

“I was extremely pleased with how Remziye handled my case, a difficult and delicate dispute with my employers. I found her to be professional, courteous and understanding of my situation. My case got resolved very quickly with the end-result exceeding my expectations.

I am very grateful to Remziye for all her help and would not hesitate to recommend Remziye to my friends and family.”

Individual Client

You have been affable and extremely efficient from the minute I met you. I cannot thank you enough for everything you have done for me. A million thanks once again.

Saleh Abdulrahim

‘Hina, you’re a superstar!!!’

Rory Kindlon

Very useful, thank you – more time needed

HR Administrator attendee

Thank you. The service I got from you it was excellent.

Akin Akinyemi

The Penguin Guide to Employment Rights will help management and workers alike to navigate this increasingly complex and important area of law

Cherie Booth

‘Made me laugh when I should have been crying’

D Rudich

“Thank you for your hard work, persistent and diligent efforts over the last few months in bringing this case to resolution.

I do not believe that we would have been able to resolve this matter without your involvement as legal advisor.

Great work and successful outcome.”

 

Tom Dyson

The update has been informative and concise with a excellent amount and choice of subjects covered. High attendance alone shows how valuable we all find these sessions. Partners are streets ahead of new laws, legislation and regulations where little to no case law exists.

Yvonne Mathurin – Head of HR – Aukett Swanke Ltd – Afternoon Update 14/09/2017

A special thanks to Hina Belitz for her interesting talk on what we must take into account before employing someone at any level. She carried us through what could be a “heavy weight” topic with such ease that we could have listened to her for hours!

Marilena Narbona – The Athena Network

A short note to say I found you and all my dealings with the company highly professional; it was a pleasure ( under the circumstances) doing business with you. You took care to listen to the detail of the case,  take it on board, build a relationship with me and the aggressor , and come to a final and acceptable agreement swiftly.

Individual client